IFSEC Insider is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
James is a co-founder of Cloudview, which leads the way in cloud-based video surveillance with a secure, scalable, user-friendly and affordable platform that can be managed and accessed from a browser using a notebook, tablet or Smartphone from anywhere in the world.
Surveillance Camera Commissioner Tony Porter has written to police chiefs warning that use of facial recognition technology poses a grave risk to our privacy – and threatens to undermine public trust in the police.
But facial recognition could ultimately give the public more, not less,confidence in law enforcement. This advanced technology forms part of a new era of artificial intelligence (AI), a whole different world that could accelerate our understanding of people’s behaviour and, crucially, identify criminals quicker than ever before.
But, as a famous Hollywood philosopher once said: “With prodigious potential, comes prodigious risk”. AI is always going to run faster than the law can keep up with. It brings both morality and practicality issues into play, and it’s something that’s unavoidable.
The police can blank out and ignore innocent people on the one hand, and focus on people that pose a real risk on the other
Whether we like it or not, we are about to enter a new revolution that will have a more profound impact than the industrial revolution. So rather than pointing at the legal implications all the time, we should be exploring ways to make AI work for everyone.
We should look at facial recognition and AI in general as a route to improving privacy rather than reducing it, while at the same time enhancing the effectiveness of such systems. It’s quite possible to achieve both.
The police can blank out and ignore innocent people on the one hand, and focus on people that pose a real risk on the other – therefore improving public confidence.
Granted, the technology is not perfect today, but it is getting there – fast – and it needs the support and direction of people like Tony Porter. It’s wrong to berate the police for using facial recognition technology when it ultimately points the way to a more effective and less intrusive way to fight crime and terrorism.
Free Download: The Video Surveillance Report 2023
Discover the latest developments in the rapidly-evolving video surveillance sector by downloading the 2023 Video Surveillance Report. Over 500 responses to our survey, which come from integrators to consultants and heads of security, inform our analysis of the latest trends including AI, the state of the video surveillance market, uptake of the cloud, and the wider economic and geopolitical events impacting the sector!
Download for FREE to discover top industry insight around the latest innovations in video surveillance systems.
Facial recognition needn’t infringe our privacy as the CCTV commissioner fears. Quite the opposite – if we get the tech rightRather than obsessing over the legal implications, we should be exploring ways to make AI work for everyone, argues Cloudview founder James Wickes.
James Wickes
IFSEC Insider | Security and Fire News and Resources
Related Topics
“The security industry is navigating a complex landscape” – Video Surveillance Report review with IDIS’ Jamie Barnfield
What’s next for AI in the security sector?
IFSEC Insider’s most-read in security: 2023 edition
Subscribe
2 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alastair
November 7, 2017 5:38 pm
“The police can blank out and ignore innocent people on the one hand, and focus on people that pose a real risk on the other – therefore improving public confidence.”
I really don’t understand what this means. Can someone explain how an algorithm might be applied in practice.It sounds like stop and search to me. Best of intentions and poorly targeted. Unless the police can demonstrate legitimacy, proportionality and some transparency then who knows what AFR means for privacy or for security.
“The police can blank out and ignore innocent people on the one hand, and focus on people that pose a real risk on the other – therefore improving public confidence.”
I really don’t understand what this means. Can someone explain how an algorithm might be applied in practice.It sounds like stop and search to me. Best of intentions and poorly targeted. Unless the police can demonstrate legitimacy, proportionality and some transparency then who knows what AFR means for privacy or for security.
true dat home boy #freemyboy21