IFSEC Insider is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Adam Bannister is a contributor to IFSEC Global, having been in the role of Editor from 2014 through to November 2019. Adam also had stints as a journalist at cybersecurity publication, The Daily Swig, and as Managing Editor at Dynamis Online Media Group.
Exploring the views of a wide range of security professionals the paper revealed the depth of concern about the deficiencies of conventional locks, the earliest incarnation of which was found in the ruins of Nineveh, the capital of ancient Assyria. As digital locks grow more reliable, secure and cost-effective, they’re even, as part of the ‘smart home’ trend, gaining a foothold in a domestic market hitherto – shared main entrances aside – the sole preserve of traditional locks.
A majority of the heads of security, facility managers, IT professionals surveyed as part of the research also believed that mechanical key systems don’t offer a high level of security and control (67%).
In a context of rapid digital innovation the humble mechanical key is looking rather antiquated – as well it might, being a technology that’s being with us for some 8,000 years. Some 77% of those polled in the ASSA ABLOY survey consider key handling to be ‘difficult and time consuming’.
An even more resounding majority (86%) consider lost keys to be a security risk, in stark contrast to readily deactivated access cards.
Nevertheless, Blake Kozak, principal analyst for research firm IHS, who offers expert analysis throughout the ASSA ABLOY white paper, believes forecasts of the traditional lock and key’s demise are premature:
Although electronic locking systems will continue to see strong growth, IHS does not expect the mechanical locks market to decline. Globally, mechanical cylinders are projected to grow by about 4.6% by volume in 2016.”
Despite the growing reliability of digital access control, several respondents did express misgivings about relying on battery power, the threat of power failure and insurers who “insist on mechanical locking out of hours.”
As another respondent observed, the future is perhaps hybrid:
For providing a high level of security, from my point of view, a general lock system should combine traditional mechanical locks and a modern access control system.”
Download the Wireless Access Control Report 2016 for more insights and analysis on the installed base of access control systems, the merits of wireless versus wired systems and training requirements, among other things.
Subscribe to the IFSEC Insider weekly newsletters
Enjoy the latest fire and security news, updates and expert opinions sent straight to your inbox with IFSEC Insider's essential weekly newsletters. Subscribe today to make sure you're never left behind by the fast-evolving industry landscape.
Could this 8,000-Year-Old Technology be in its Death Throes?It’s possible, according to 62% of security professionals. Discover more insights on mechanical versus electronic locks taken from a recent access-control white paper from IFSEC Global and ASSA ABLOY.
Adam Bannister
IFSEC Insider | Security and Fire News and Resources
Related Topics
The Body Shop boosts operational efficiency with locker solution
Whitepaper: Multi-residential access management – The move to digital
Hi Adam, Great article that caused me to think. I do have a pointer that may assist you in the future. I’d like to share it with you if I may. The questionnaire could do with a little revision as it appears biased. Allow me to explain. For example, the opening sentence ‘which of these statements do you agree with’…. well…. it’s kind of salesman pitch. To obtain reliable data it might be ‘neutral’; for example, ‘please rate from 1-5’ In addition, the questions themselves are ‘leading’ – a bit like your wife asking you ‘do you like my dress?’… Read more »
Terrasyss Thanks for the feedback. I do see your point. Surveys are trickier to put together than many people might imagine. Pitch a question slightly wrong and, as you say, it can elicit misleading responses. Same problem with scientific studies (albeit countless other variables at play).
Hi Adam, Great article that caused me to think. I do have a pointer that may assist you in the future. I’d like to share it with you if I may. The questionnaire could do with a little revision as it appears biased. Allow me to explain. For example, the opening sentence ‘which of these statements do you agree with’…. well…. it’s kind of salesman pitch. To obtain reliable data it might be ‘neutral’; for example, ‘please rate from 1-5’ In addition, the questions themselves are ‘leading’ – a bit like your wife asking you ‘do you like my dress?’… Read more »
Terrasyss Thanks for the feedback. I do see your point. Surveys are trickier to put together than many people might imagine. Pitch a question slightly wrong and, as you say, it can elicit misleading responses. Same problem with scientific studies (albeit countless other variables at play).