IFSEC Insider is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Adam Bannister is a contributor to IFSEC Global, having been in the role of Editor from 2014 through to November 2019. Adam also had stints as a journalist at cybersecurity publication, The Daily Swig, and as Managing Editor at Dynamis Online Media Group.
The use of public inquiries to learn lessons from major tragedies is being undermined by a failure to act on their recommendations, a think tank has argued.
In a new report, the Institute for Government says that the exhaustive nature of public inquiries is at odds with how their conclusions are overlooked.
Called ‘How public inquiries can lead to change’, the report found that only six of the 68 public inquiries instigated by the government since 1990 – at a costs of £639m – have been fully investigated by select committees.
With one in seven taking five years or longer to publish their findings, the Institute for Government also warned that the the process of change was left in stasis for too long.
Lakanal House
As the public inquiry into the Grenfell fire plays out in London, the fire industry will hope for a more effective response than was seen in the wake of the Lakanal House inquiry. Many recommendations, including that Approved Document be was in need of review, were not acted on or progress was patchy.
There was also an interval of nearly four years between the tragedy, in which six people died.
The report recommends that:
Parliament orders government to report on progress in acting on recommendations annually to select committees
Interim reports should be published months, rather than years, after the inquiries issue their recommendations, says the report.
Expert witnesses should be be involved in developing the recommendations of inquiries.
“Government has spent over half a billion pounds on inquiries since 1990 and uses them more and more,” Emma Norris, programme director at the Institute for Government. “As we speak, there are eight separate inquiries running into some of the biggest tragedies this country has seen.
“But our report finds that the aftermath of inquiries are being neglected. The implementation of findings is patchy and there is no proper procedure for holding government to account for change.
“Government needs to systematically provide a full and detailed response to inquiry findings and select committees need to make the follow up to inquiry recommendations a core part of their work.”
2023 Fire Safety eBook – Grab your free copy!
Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.
Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.
Exhaustive public inquiries undermined by “patchy” follow-up, says reportThe use of public inquiries to learn lessons from major tragedies is being undermined by a failure to act on their recommendations, a think tank has argued.
Adam Bannister
IFSEC Insider | Security and Fire News and Resources
Related Topics
All large developers deemed in scope have now signed government’s remediation contract
High court judgement appears to confirm Government decision to not implement PEEP recommendations
Anxiety, mistrust and anger: The resident’s view of the Building Safety Crisis