Avatar photo

Journalist, IFSEC Global

June 22, 2018

Download

Whitepaper: Enhancing security, resilience and efficiency across a range of industries

FIREX 2018

The concept of mass panic during a disaster is a myth, Dr Chris Cocking tells FIREX 2018

Dr Chris Cocking’s talk ‘Human behaviours during emergencies’ presented at the FPA Infozone at FIREX provided insight into how people really behave during an incident and how understanding this can be implemented into evacuation plans to ensure people’s safety.

“Studies have shown that mass panic in an emergency is very rare” said Dr Cocking, Senior Lecturer, School of Health Sciences at the University of Brighton, as he presented to a packed theatre. “If you assume a panic model you view crowds as a problem not a resource and this can create problems you are trying to avoid.”

The traditional panic model would argue that in a scary context this overrides rationality and causes people to act selfishly which means that if everyone is behaving like that, those ‘contagion behaviours will spread across a crowd.

“I’m not saying there is no selfish behaviour during incidents but there is a lot less than people tend to believe.”

Dr Cocking’s research is based on the social identity model of collective resilience (SIMCR) and dismisses predetermined views of crowd behaviour. “There is more evidence to suggest that cooperation actually prevails over selfish behaviour and that disasters bring people together”, explained Dr. Cocking.

“Disasters result in orderly, altruistic behaviour as people escape the common threat.” In general any lack of cooperation is actually due to physical constraints. “I’m not saying there is no selfish behaviour during incidents but there is a lot less than people tend to believe.”

‘Panic is often used as an explanation to deflect blame away from possible crowd or venue mismanagement which cast the victims as villians.”

There is also very little evidence to suggest that people panic if they are made aware of the threat which means that information should not be withheld. “This could delay evacuation and cause problems in future emergencies.”

Overall this means there should be more information not less and this needs to be conveyed in a clear way that tells people what’s going on, what the threat is and what they need to do to escape it.

It is vital to plan and improve responses as well as train staff so that they know the layout and exits inside out and can efficiently lead people to safety in the event of an incident.

2023 Fire Safety eBook – Grab your free copy!

Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.

Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.

FireSafetyeBook-CoverPage-23
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Reed
Paul Reed
July 5, 2018 9:10 am

What a load of rubbish, panic is not a myth but a dangerous reality.
I have seen many instances of panic and it is “contagious”, i have seen many Fire Brigade videos where the results of panic has resulted in many deaths and even piled five high at fire exit doors as people try to escape.