Managing Editor, IFSEC Insider

Author Bio ▼

James Moore is the Managing Editor of IFSEC Insider, the leading online publication for security and fire news in the industry.James writes, commissions, edits and produces content for IFSEC Insider, including articles, breaking news stories and exclusive industry reports. He liaises and speaks with leading industry figures, vendors and associations to ensure security and fire professionals remain abreast of all the latest developments in the sector.
January 27, 2022


Lithium-Ion batteries. A guide to the fire risk that isn’t going away but can be managed

Building safety

Additional £27 million for Waking Watch Relief Fund announced by government

Designed to “remove” or “reduce” the need for interim safety measures at high-rise buildings with unsafe cladding, the then-UK Housing Secretary, Robert Jenrick, announced a £30 million Waking Watch Relief Fund on 17 December 2020. The fund’s first round of funding opened on 31 January 2021, a second round opened on the 16th September 2021, and a third round has now been opened with an additional £27 million being made available by the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC). 

The fund will “help end the scandal of excessive waking watch costs” via the installation of fire alarm systems in high-rise buildings, according to the Government. The additional funding, announced in late January 2022, will help end leaseholders being “forced to pay for Waking Watches” and “encourage the installation of fire alarms… in an estimated 300 additional buildings”, said a DLUHC statement.

The fund is designed to cover the upfront capital costs of installing an alarm system. The common fire alarm system should generally be designed in accordance with the recommendations of BS 5839-1 for a Category L5 system, which is referred to in the NFCC’s revised guidance on simultaneous evacuation.

To be eligible a building must:

  • Be in the private sector.
  • Be over 18 metres in height.
  • Have an unsafe cladding system.
  • Have a waking watch in place where these costs have been passed on to leaseholders.
  • Social sector buildings that can provide evidence of waking watch costs that have been passed on to leaseholders may also be eligible

According to the latest figures available (as of 30 September 2021), 186 successful applications have been made, covering 281 buildings, with £24.1 million of the funding have been approved. Though the Government’s latest statement indicates that the number of buildings being supported has now reached 323 (27 January 2022). The full figures as of 30 September are available on the Gov.uk website. 

£30 million was initially made available (while another £5 million was added shortly after), with an additional £27 million being announced on 27 January 2022 by Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove. The announcement followed shortly after Mr Gove’s statement in the House of Commons that he wanted developers to cover the costs of the Building Safety Crisis.

Minister of State for Building Safety and Fire, Lord Greenhalgh said:  “It’s unacceptable that innocent leaseholders are still facing fire risks in their own homes, let alone being subjected to the disgraceful misuse of rip-off measures at the hands of their building owners. The extra funding being made available today will be a huge relief to many being forced to pay unnecessary costs.

“However, fire alarms and Waking Watch are not long-term solutions. Industry must take responsibility and pay to fix their dangerous mistakes, and we are actively pursuing developers and manufacturers at fault to bring this scandal to an end.”

Designed to replace Waking Watch

‘Waking Watch’ patrols have been a long source of frustration and contention from leaseholders, residents and fire safety professionals, with an average monthly cost of £137 to a flat owner – rising to £256 in London. Introduced in the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy over three years ago in high-rise buildings considered high-risk, thousands of residents and homeowners continue to pay for the 24-hour fire safety patrols.

The number of affected buildings has continued to rise, too. In London, 573 blocks had patrols by December 2020, compared to 286 in March in the same year, as more buildings continued to be identified as ‘unsafe’.

The installation of fire alarms should enable significant cost savings, believes the Government.

In research undertaken between June to September 2020, the costs of employing a person to carry out Waking Watch duties 24 hours a day exceeds the average one-off cost of installing a fire alarm system in three to six months, depending on the hourly rate charged.

In addition, some buildings require more than one person to carry out Waking Watch duties, while this doesn’t take additional charges into account, such as radio/training costs or toilet hire.

Upon launch of the fund, Mr Jenrick said: “I’ve heard first-hand from leaseholders the misery that rip-off waking watch costs have been bringing to residents of high-rise buildings with cladding.

“I’m announcing a £30m Waking Watch Relief Fund to help relieve the financial pressure on those residents and to ensure they are safe. I’m confident that this will make a real difference to worried leaseholders up and down the country this Christmas.

“We have continued to prioritise the removal of unsafe ACM cladding throughout the pandemic and expect around 95% of remediation work will have been completed or be underway by the end of this year.”

National Fire Chiefs Council Chair, Roy Wilsher, added: “We welcome this new Waking Watch Relief Fund, which will help to reduce the financial burden for some leaseholders having to fund the costs of waking watches.

“It has been our firm and long held expectation that building owners should move to install common fire alarms as quickly as possible and this funding is a positive step.”

Waking Watch Fund application process

Robert Jenrick

Robert Jenrick, UK Housing Secretary at the time of the Waking Watch Fund launch

On January 31 2021 it was announced the fund was now open for applications from the Responsible Person (RP) – the person, entity or group responsible for ensuring the safety of residents in their building from fire and identifying suitable mitigating measures where needed. RPs are being encouraged to speak to their local Fire and Rescue Service about the implications of installing a common fire alarm in their building.

The fund will be distributed through councils, regional authorities and centrally though the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), depending on location, with £22m of the £30m initially having been allocated to the eight cities that were estimated to have the most need. Greater London received £16.1m, Greater Manchester £2.1 and Birmingham £1.1m, with the other five recipients being Leeds, Liverpool, Bristol, Newcastle and Sheffield. The Government says these allocations have been based on the Building Safety Fund registration statistics, with “adjustments made to account for social sector funding”. The remaining £8m will be available centrally and is available to all other areas of England.

MHCLG guidance for applications highlights that Waking Watch patrols and alarms should be considered “a short-term option that mitigate an immediate risk”, rather than an alternative to remediation, and alarm systems should be installed “as quickly as possible” when funding is agreed.

It is also advised that “consideration should be given to installing an alarm specified to allow upgrade to a BS8629 Emergency Evacuation Alert System once remediation is completed”. This will allow the alarm system to be converted for the use of an evacuation alert system which is compatible with the ‘Stay Put’ strategy, and “reasonable costs of installing these alarms may be covered by the fund”.

The fund will cover the costs of fire alarms installed after 17 December 2020. A second round of applications opened on 16th September 2021, while a third opened on 27 January 2022.

The full criteria for the Waking Watch fund, including application guidance, can be found here.

Do the measures go far enough?

Upon the initial announcement, questions remained on whether the £30 million fund went far enough.

Stephen Mackenzie, Independent Fire, Security and Resilience Expert, offered his thoughts: “Unfortunately, the numbers don’t add up and £30m is ‘breadcrumbs’ in relative terms. We have 457 high-rise blocks with ACM, as well as 2820 non-ACM registering for the Building Safety Fund.

“£30m is inadequate when we have varying reports of 500-700 blocks with Waking Watch in London alone, while reports of fire alarm systems costing anywhere between £50-500k.

“This is not ‘Waking Watch relief’ as it fails to address any historic cost now or in the future, when families are now facing prohibition notice, bankruptcy, and homelessness as we saw in Sheffield and other blocks.

“There is wider issue in general here, too. MHCLG recently projected 8,000 highrise buidings over 18m, plus 50,000 over 11m, all that require emergency EWS1 surveys. Three and half years post-Grenfell, and we are concerned that MHCLG continues to use ‘estimates’. We simply do not trust the figures on the numbers of blocks, families and residents impacted, given the significant variance in figures. For many, this is already too late, with residents reporting endemic mental health issues and bankruptcy, amongst other issues, as a result.

Speaking to the BBC, the Manchester and Liverpool Cladiators campaign group also commented: “After months of waiting for a full and fair solution, we hoped for more detail and more funding.

“Given there are up to 1,000 buildings in the country, where a Waking Watch is in place, we remain concerned that this new funding will help less than a third of the residents affected. Many will be left unable to benefit from this announcement. In effect, another safety lottery has been created.”

The fund opened on January 31 2021, but when first launched was also said to be providing “immediate, emergency support to Wicker Riverside Apartments in Sheffield”. The occupants and their families were evacuated in mid-December, but Waking Watch patrols were organised so they could return in time for Christmas. The building failed fire safety tests after an inspection by South Yorkshire Fire Service on 11 December, and residents are now concerned that they are living with a ‘weekly eviction threat’.

The £1billion Building Safety Fund deadline was also extended by six months in December to “ensure more eligible buildings can remove unsafe cladding”.

Read the full government statement on the Waking Watch Relief Fund.

This article was first published on 18 December 2020, and has since been updated to reflect the ongoing situation and updates from government. 

2023 Fire Safety eBook – Grab your free copy!

Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.

Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.


Related Topics

Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jakes Jakobsen
Jakes Jakobsen
December 23, 2020 11:14 am

This is a serious problem which could be mitigated by the use of IoT technology in the interim. Cheap sensors can augment current fire detection systems until the buildings have been made safe