IFSEC Insider is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Cherry Park is an experienced freelance journalist and reporter who specializes in features, news, and news analysis, in print and online. She has written extensively in the areas of health and safety, fire safety, employment, HR, recruitment, rewards, pay and benefits, market research, environment, and metallurgy, and she also conducts research.
The Chief Fire Officers Association aim to help businesses in maintaining fire safety following feedback that current regulations are inconsistently applied.
In view of the confusion and inconsistency of approaches to fire safety standards often found in smaller enterprises, CFOA will lead a programme of improvement in the understanding of fire safety regulations and their enforcement.
Focus on Enforcement review
The CFOA’s move comes in response to the government’s recent Focus on Enforcement review, which looked at enforcement of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order (RRO) 2005 in small- to medium-sized businesses.
The Review identified a need for more consistent application of regulation and better guidance for companies regarding how to comply with the law.
Although the Review found some evidence of good enforcement practice, and while it praised the advice and support offered through dedicated business-outreach teams by Fire and Rescue Authorities (FRAs), it also highlighted negative experiences of enforcement under the RRO, such as:
inconsistency of approach and advice, with considerable variation in the approach to regulatory functions, and also examples of conflicting requirements between different areas and different officers;
vague enforcement notices that leave businesses unsure what remedial action is required of them;
confusing guidance, with multiple versions of common templates, a variety of guidance documents, and confusion between informal advice and legal requirements;
no obvious route for appeals to be made;
no simple mechanism for raising queries; and
too many additional costly safety measures being required after each FRA visit with no real evidence of a change in risk.
CFOA’s response
CFOA welcomed the review, saying it is committed to working closely with businesses and with FRAs to address the findings and improve the way in which fire safety regulations are enforced.
The body said it recognized that more can still be done to improve the quality of service provided to the business community, while aiding consumer protection and supporting economic growth.
Improvements
CFOA’s planned remedial steps include:
leading a business-engagement forum to help industry shape regulatory practices, raise future concerns, and generate innovative solutions;
creating a professional, accredited, framework of competence for fire safety officers nationally;
providing clearer and more consistent support and direction to businesses, including consistency in formal notices, clarity on addressing identified failures of compliance, and clearly distinguishing informal advice from compulsory requirements;
promoting the use, and acceptance, of recognised professional certification and accreditation for commercial fire risk assessors;
building on the good practice already developed by a number of FRAs in providing support to small business; and
encouraging all FRAs to engage with Local Enterprise Partnerships to support better communication with companies.
This is a new era for the delivery of fire safety regulations. CFOA have listened to the concerns of business contained within the [Focus on Enforcement] review and will lead Fire and Rescue Services to deliver on our commitments.
Business can be confident that we will continue to work closely with them to deliver cost-effective fire safety solutions that support economic growth, help businesses recover quicker in the event of a fire and build safer communities.
Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.
Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.
CFOA to Lead Business Engagement as RRO ‘Inconsistency’ CriticizedThe Chief Fire Officers Association aim to help businesses in maintaining fire safety following feedback that current regulations are inconsistently […]
Cherry Park
IFSEC Insider | Security and Fire News and Resources
Related Topics
Firestopping training course launched by ASFP for installers
Two new Experienced Worker Assessment routes approved for fire and security industry
Amthal expands accredited fire and security training to consultant and specifier customers
Subscribe
4 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NIMBUSFIRE
August 16, 2013 2:58 am
Why can’t we admit that fire safety order is rubbish? It was enacted to cut fire service fire safety officers and provide income generation by fines levied by people who do not understand fire safety but react to emotional theory. It came in heralding the removal of inconstancies, it is worse now! Fire deaths will increase over years because of this dreadful legislation and destroy the good record the UK have, infringements are common place even in Government premises and the lack of proper risk assessments are numerous. Do something before we repeat history by having fires where there is… Read more »
A problem with being a world leader is you can get complacent. I think there’s a danger that that is what is happening here, myself. Third world standards I think is a little generous to third world fire safety and a little harsh on the UK, but there are certainly issues to be dealt with here.
Rob: The only thing saving us with new buioldings is BS9999 the existing are at risk, obviously not all but there are some serious infringments putting people at risk. The organisations that are flouting the legislation includes Government, Fire Service, Councils as well as privately owned operations like care homes, hotels, etc. Recently undertaken Building Control work in Cardiff, the building occupied by one of the leading contractors to the Government and did their own risk assessment by their fire service, it was very poor indeed. Don’t think it is complacentcy, think stupidity and corruption is closer to the fact. … Read more »
Stupidity and corruption, very strong words indeed. I’m not sure replacing the RRO would necessarily tackle that, but perhaps stronger (dare I say custodial?) sentences and better enforcement could help.
Why can’t we admit that fire safety order is rubbish? It was enacted to cut fire service fire safety officers and provide income generation by fines levied by people who do not understand fire safety but react to emotional theory. It came in heralding the removal of inconstancies, it is worse now! Fire deaths will increase over years because of this dreadful legislation and destroy the good record the UK have, infringements are common place even in Government premises and the lack of proper risk assessments are numerous. Do something before we repeat history by having fires where there is… Read more »
A problem with being a world leader is you can get complacent. I think there’s a danger that that is what is happening here, myself. Third world standards I think is a little generous to third world fire safety and a little harsh on the UK, but there are certainly issues to be dealt with here.
Rob: The only thing saving us with new buioldings is BS9999 the existing are at risk, obviously not all but there are some serious infringments putting people at risk. The organisations that are flouting the legislation includes Government, Fire Service, Councils as well as privately owned operations like care homes, hotels, etc. Recently undertaken Building Control work in Cardiff, the building occupied by one of the leading contractors to the Government and did their own risk assessment by their fire service, it was very poor indeed. Don’t think it is complacentcy, think stupidity and corruption is closer to the fact. … Read more »
Stupidity and corruption, very strong words indeed. I’m not sure replacing the RRO would necessarily tackle that, but perhaps stronger (dare I say custodial?) sentences and better enforcement could help.