Avatar photo

Director

Author Bio ▼

Claire is Director of Clarity Safety Solutions Ltd., an Oban-based health and safety consultancy. She has more than 17 years of health and safety experience advising organisations and is a Chartered Member of the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health, an OSHCR registered consultant, and an IFE registered life safety assessor. Since attempting to leave the rat race in 2008, and moving to the West Coast of Scotland, Claire has written hundreds of articles, reports, policies, papers, newsletters, and training courses. Nevertheless, she continues to help clients directly with their health, safety, and fire safety arrangements both within the UK and abroad.
May 10, 2013

Download

Whitepaper: Enhancing security, resilience and efficiency across a range of industries

Fire Safety Legislation in Scotland

The perversities of the UK legal system mean that some areas of law are regionalised. One of them is fire safety. What does this mean in practice if you do business in Scotland?

Principle fire legislation
Fire safety law is constructed differently in Scotland than it is in England and Wales. So there’s no Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (FSO). Instead there’s the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 and the Fire Safety (Scotland) Regulations 2006 (as amended).

The Act describes the legal status and powers of fire and rescue services as well as containing, within Part 3, the duties of employers, those in control of non-domestic premises, and also employees. The duties are set out in broad terms, e.g., conducting a fire safety risk assessment and the implementation of fire safety arrangements. The Regulations cover the details and include requirements to provide fire fighting facilities, maintain safe means of escape, provide information and training, ensure the availability of competent assistance, cooperation, and coordination in shared workplaces, and so on.

Employee duties
Employees’ duties are, under the Act, to take reasonable care of themselves and others with respect to fire risk, and to cooperate with their employers. Furthermore, under the Regulations they must alert their employers to any immediate dangers or other shortfalls relating to fire safety.

Although the construction of the legislation differs from that of England and Wales, the outcome, in terms of employer and employee responsibilities are essentially the same. In fact the wording is precisely the same in most cases.

Responsible people
The main difference is that within the FSO a ‘Responsible Person’ (RP) role is defined, but no such role is included within the Scottish law. The RP is the employer, if a workplace is to any extent within the employer’s control. In the absence of an employer, the ‘person’ in control of an undertaking at the premises is the RP. And as a final resort, the owner is the RP. The allocation of the role is hierarchical in England and Wales.

In Scottish law, the lack of this role creates a subtle variance. In Scotland all parties with any control share responsibility to the extent of their control (Section 54, Fire (Scotland) Act 2005). So for example, the landlord of a building in England can devolve responsibility for most aspects of fire safety to the tenant, but in Scotland this only applies to the extent of the tenant’s control, which may leave the landlord with significant responsibilities.

Guidance
As in England, the Scottish law is supported by guidance documents. The contents of these are very similar to the England and Wales ones published by the Communities and Local Government Department, the main difference being, somewhat inconveniently, that the Scottish government sector specific guides are only published online. So take care if, like me, you use your handy English printed guide as a first port of call. There are subtle differences in wording, some of which make a difference.

The Scottish sector-specific guidance documents are available for a smaller range of premises types. England and Wales guides not replicated by the Scottish Government include: animal premises and stables; means of escape for disabled people; open-air events and venues; and theatres, cinemas, and similar premises. There are also some guides where a single document covers the ground work of several in the England and Wales set — Places of Entertainment and Assembly, for example, is a single document rather than being split into versions for small and large venues.

Building regulations
The governance of building works and alterations differs slightly in Scotland. There is specific Scottish legislation (the primary legislation being The Building (Scotland) Act 2003) and a different system of guidance. Instead of Approved Documents there are Technical Handbooks. For example, in England and Wales, Approved Document B provides information on the fire safety requirements for buildings, whereas in Scotland you would refer to Section 2 of the Technical Handbook. The planning and building control process is also slightly different.

What else?
The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the many regulations made under it, apply equally to Scotland as they do to England and Wales. So, for example, the following health and safety laws apply the same regardless of where you are:

  • The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002
  • Electricity at Work Regulations 1989
  • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007
  • Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998

Enforcement
On 1 April 2013 the eight fire and rescue services across Scotland were amalgamated into a single, new Scottish Fire and Rescue Service.

2023 Fire Safety eBook – Grab your free copy!

Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.

Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.

FireSafetyeBook-CoverPage-23
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
batye
batye
May 12, 2013 4:10 am

I think from the fire safety point of view it does make a lot of the sense have a same fire legislation… across the land as it would be more easy to comply and follow… but almost same problem we have in Canada as each province have it own rules of Fire Safety and they almost the same but few things is different… 

Claire Rizos
Claire Rizos
May 12, 2013 4:19 am
Reply to  batye

Yes quite right. I was working in Alberta and British Columbia last year and my experiences within the UK, prepared me well for your regional differences! What do you find are the main discrepancies?  

batye
batye
May 12, 2013 4:33 am
Reply to  Claire Rizos

in the identification of the fire safety stationshow often equipment need to be testededucation level of the employees responsible for the fire safetyin some provinces – they have no idea they got designated as fire safety personnel for emergency…. not even on paper…

SunitaT
SunitaT
May 12, 2013 7:33 am
Reply to  batye

I think from the fire safety point of view it does make a lot of the sense have a same fire legislation… across the land as it would be more easy to comply and follow
, true. I think its always better to have same fire legislation. I think what needs to be done is take the best of the legislation from both the versions and bring final legislation.

batye
batye
May 12, 2013 1:23 pm
Reply to  SunitaT

thank you, in my books unified standards in Fire Safety Legislation create better compliancebetter compliance create better safety and faster response time… also less retraining need it if workers get moved from place to place in case of mining industry or oil drilling…