Avatar photo

Author Bio ▼

Rob Ratcliff was the Content and Community Manager of IFSEC Global.com. He is a self-confessed everyman in the world of security and fire, keen to learn from the global community of experts who have been a part of IFSEC for 40 years now.
April 10, 2013

Nothing found. Please check your show/episode id.

Download

State of Physical Access Trend Report 2024

Opinions Split Over Future of Fire Services

There is a huge split in opinions over what should become of fire services in London and beyond.

A poll on IFSEC Global last month revealed an almost exact split in views on whether the £28.8 million cuts to London Fire Brigade are needed.

Thirty-four percent of people responded that the cuts are needed, backing the fire service’s view that with half as many fires as a decade ago, cuts are justified. But another 34 percent said that cuts are necessary but this is too much, too fast. The remaining 32 percent agreed with the Fire Brigades Union saying that the cuts were the biggest threat to the London Fire Brigade since the Blitz.

Are the £28.8 million cuts to London Fire Brigade needed?
Yes, there are half as many fires as a decade ago.
34.09%
34.09% [ 15 ]
The cuts are necessary, but they are too much, too fast.
34.09%
34.09% [ 15 ]
No, these cuts are the biggest threat to LFB since the Blitz!
31.82%
31.82% [ 14 ]

These results show that the idea of fire service cuts is extremely contentious and also that the position of fire bosses is made considerably more difficult due to there being almost exactly the same numbers of people approaching the challenge of budget cuts with each of these three different views.

The consultation into the draft London Safety Plan (LSP5) has been extended to 17 June 2013, with the final decision into whether or not to approve the cuts being taken by the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson.

The Fire Brigades Union has repeatedly called on the Mayor to abandon the plans. On March 15, firefighters from Woolwich fire station — among those proposed to be closed — rescued an unconscious woman from a house fire while their colleagues from Plumstead fire station were still stuck in traffic.

FBU regional secretary for London, Paul Embery said:

I have absolutely no doubt that this woman would have died if Woolwich fire station had already closed. That’s why we are right to warn against the terrible consequences of shutting fire stations. These cuts will affect real Londoners in the most devastating way. In a service like ours, seconds really do count, as this incident proves. Closing 12 fire stations will be the difference between life and death for some people.

The split in views of IFSEC Global.com users polled is indicative of the high feeling among the public and experts within the industry. The poll result also has implications beyond London, as fire services across the UK and around the world grapple with budget concerns.

In an interesting international parallel, the New London, Connecticut, fire department is also grappling with proposed cuts from their Mayor. The department was able to stave off 25 job losses last year, however, and the current cuts are at a significantly smaller level of $500,000.

2023 Fire Safety eBook – Grab your free copy!

Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.

Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.

FireSafetyeBook-CoverPage-23
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SunitaT
SunitaT
April 11, 2013 5:30 am

, thanks for sharing the poll results. I feel the cuts are necessary, but it should be done in more planned manner after studying the impact of these cuts on fire safety. Lets hope  £28.8 million cuts to London Fire Brigade will not have any impact on fire security. 

Rob Ratcliff
Rob Ratcliff
April 11, 2013 10:02 am
Reply to  SunitaT

Hard to tell. The unions are pretty solid that it will cost lives, while the bosses and the London Assembly are clear it won’t. Obviously both are coming at the problem with opposite agendas, so one would have thought the answer would be somewhere in the middle.

Mike Friend
Mike Friend
April 15, 2013 4:02 am
Reply to  Rob Ratcliff

I think any firefighter serving or retired can tell stories of death by fire and the difference a few minutes makes. Children trapped in a bedroom – neighbour smashed window – ‘to give them air’ and provides a fast track path for the fire = 4 dead – Fire Brigade called late while they pussyfooted about. I have said before call numbers may have gone down and large fires are not seen as often as in my day – but it is the chip pan fire at midnight that kills not a warehouse burning down. I’m glad it’s not my… Read more »

Rob Ratcliff
Rob Ratcliff
April 16, 2013 11:25 am
Reply to  Mike Friend

Not necessarily stupid providing those people are properly trained and accredited. But as we have touched on, often they’re not. Sometimes they are. You get what you pay for as well.