We take a look at some of the latest and most important fire safety prosecutions in the UK.
GB pound 200,000 fine for nuclear plant
The Atomic Weapons Establishment, which provides warheads for the Trident nuclear deterrent, was fined GB pound 200,000 for fire safety breaches following a fire at its Aldermaston, Berkshire, site in August 2010, during which an employee suffered burns to his arm and face.
Ashley Emery told the Reading Crown Court that he was breaking volatile substances into a plastic bucket as part of a process to manufacture explosives. The bucket’s contents ignited, and a fireball erupted in his face. The fire, which took place in an area without nuclear explosives, took five hours to extinguish.
HSE inspector Dave Norman told the BBC after the fine was announced, “The fire could have caused multiple casualties, and it was entirely preventable had better control systems been in place.”
Judge Richard Parkes QC fined the company GB pound 200,000 and ordered it to pay GB pound 80,258 in costs.
Three landlords guilty of breaches
In three recent cases, landlords have been in the dock for fire safety violations.
In Redcar, Cleveland, Nicholas Hyde was fined GB pound 18,000 by Teesside magistrates after the Cleveland Fire Brigade found that residents of flats in one of the 19 properties he owned were in “imminent” danger of fire. During an inspection, brigade officers found:
Hyde, who had tried to blame his tenants for the poor conditions, was also ordered to pay GB pound 3,082 in costs.
More information from Gazette Live
In Morecambe, Lancashire, a family of eight was forced to flee their home in a house of multiple occupation owned by Graham Sawings after a chip pan caught fire on the middle floor of the building in July.
The district judge at the Blackpool Magistrates’ Court said that the people on the top floor of the building could have died. Sawings pleaded guilty to 10 breaches of fire regulations. Witnesses testified that:
Sawings will be sentenced by the Preston Crown Court.
In the Blackpool Magistrates’ Court, Mohammed Attique admitted to nine breaches of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 after the first of two fires in the kitchen of an Indian takeaway in Blackpool in November endangered two staff members living in a flat above the shop.
District Judge Edward Barr fined Attique GB pound 9,000, ordered him to pay GB pound 2,607 in costs, and said he was guilty of “gross negligence.” The property had:
The landlord was required to comply with an enforcement notice before the premises could be used as living accommodation, so the staff members moved out. A second fire occurred there in January.
Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.
Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.
thank you for the info, it interesting to know how legal system in the Fire Prosecution works in UK, and I’m glad to hear violators get punished…
Hi Cherry, all sounds good these prosecutions but the trouble is (and in the interests of balance and fairness) maybe tyou should also list those that fail to get a conviction.
I have no problems with name and shame of individuals as long we can also see which enforcing authorites got it wrong as well!
It does not.
Interesting idea Bob. We sometimes like to share prosecutions to give people a general idea of some of the mistakes that people can and have made. It would be interesting to find out about some failed prosecutions, but equally I’m not sure how much we would learn from that? Another interesting angle could be exploring some of the most effective remedial actions following a prohibition notice, perhaps. Again, difficult to find out about, though.
Hi Rob, we always think its good to have a list of the ‘bad guys’ who get found guilty under the RRFSO but when F&RS announces they were going to name and shame I thought and said that this could be an agenda for F&RS to start a league table for themselves of who was the most successful at prosecutions. It hasnt quite happened as yet but if there is a boast about who gets done under the Regulations then equally there should be a list of the those F&RS who took prosecutions and got it all wrong i.e.… Read more »