Journalist, Cherry Park

Author Bio ▼

Cherry Park is an experienced freelance journalist and reporter who specializes in features, news, and news analysis, in print and online. She has written extensively in the areas of health and safety, fire safety, employment, HR, recruitment, rewards, pay and benefits, market research, environment, and metallurgy, and she also conducts research.
April 19, 2018

Sign up to free email newsletters

Download

Mobile access series #1: What you need to know

BUILDING REGULATIONS

Dame Hackitt urged to introduce ‘duty holder’ role to increase accountability

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has called for a duty holder with responsibility for fire safety to be introduced through the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety headed up by Dame Judith Hackitt.

According to Inside Housing, the call from the fire chief membership body came in response to the prosecution of a property managing agent following the death of a woman in a tower block fire in August 2012.

Prosecution

Sophie Rosser, 23, died following the fire in Meridian Place in London’s Docklands where she lived on the fifth floor. She was found unconscious by firefighters and treated at the scene by London’s Helicopter Emergency Medical Service before being taken to hospital, where she later died.

London Fire Brigade (LFB) carried out an inspection of the building following the fire and discovered several serious fire safety failures, including:

  • Failure to take general fire precautions to ensure the premises are safe
  • Failure to have a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment
  • Failure to monitor and review the preventative and protective measures
  • Failure to equip and maintain the building with firefighting equipment
  • Failure to properly maintain the fire detection system.

Sentences

Parc Properties Management Limited (PPML), the managing agent for Meridian Place Management, was ordered to pay £40,000 at Southwark Crown Court on 19 March after pleading guilty to two offences under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order (RRO) 2005.

Vance Miller, who conducted a fire risk assessment for PPML at Meridian Place in 2008, also pleaded guilty to one offence under the RRO, and was fined £2,000 with £5,000 costs.

Duty holder

According to Inside Housing, the Hackitt review, set up post-Grenfell, is considering a recommendation to introduce a duty holder who would have ultimate responsibility for fire safety in a building, in order to ensure that fire safety responsibilities are taken seriously.

This could be the building owner, but in situations where the ownership of the building is complex, it would be someone based in the UK. The duty holder would need to work with residents, including leaseholders, and a regulator would oversee their work to ensure they are meeting their responsibilities.

Fire safety experts have reported significant confusion about who the responsible person required in law for fire safety is in privately-owned buildings where there may be a freeholder and owner(s) as well as a property management company.

Read more at Inside Housing.

INTRUDER ALARM INSTALLER SURVEY - chance to win a £100 Amazon voucher

Does your business install, integrate or maintain intruder alarm systems (or have plans to)? This Texecom-sponsored survey takes a few minutes to complete and enters you into a prize draw for a £100 Amazon voucher (or equivalent value in local currency). This survey will inform the findings of a forthcoming trend report published on IFSEC Global.

Related Topics

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
David Sugden Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
David Sugden
Guest
David Sugden

Whilst I understand the confusion it really should not be there. The RRO established that a “Responsible Person” be appointed from Hand Over and is just that, the person responsible for ensuring safety in the building through risk assessment. The contractor is obliged under regulation 38 to provide the RP with all relevant information. We should not be reinventing wheel here, just seeing that it is understood and followed

Sign up to free email newsletters