Avatar photo

Director

Author Bio ▼

Claire is Director of Clarity Safety Solutions Ltd., an Oban-based health and safety consultancy. She has more than 17 years of health and safety experience advising organisations and is a Chartered Member of the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health, an OSHCR registered consultant, and an IFE registered life safety assessor. Since attempting to leave the rat race in 2008, and moving to the West Coast of Scotland, Claire has written hundreds of articles, reports, policies, papers, newsletters, and training courses. Nevertheless, she continues to help clients directly with their health, safety, and fire safety arrangements both within the UK and abroad.
April 27, 2016

Download

Whitepaper: Enhancing security, resilience and efficiency across a range of industries

Fire Prevention at Waste Sites: How the Guidance is Evolving

For those involved in life safety fire risk assessment, the idea of a fire-risk assessment to protect the environment may seem a little strange.

But that’s precisely what is required of most businesses which store or treat combustible waste.

What’s the story?

It’s believed that there are fire and rescue call outs to on average one fire per day at waste and recycling sites within the UK. And once fire takes hold in a waste pile, it can take weeks to bring under control.

For example, as we reported in 2012 a man was jailed for two years for allowing a fire to take hold at a site in Dewsbury which then burned for over a month. The cost of the clean-up and fire-fighting operation was estimated at £1.2 million. There have been numerous similar examples in the news.

The environmental impact of such fires can be considerable involving contaminated fire-fighting water which may reach ground water our surface water courses, air pollution and ground contamination in the vicinity. Environment Agency research based on 25 waste fires has concluded that there is a potential that people can be affected within a radius of at least 1km of the site where the fire occurs.

They have also concluded that the harmful health effects are more pronounced where a fire continues for more than 3 or 4 hours. This is based on the expectation that the public can take shelter for a few hours, but beyond that they are more likely to be exposed to the harmful smoke, suffering from sore eyes, runny nose, sore throat, coughing, difficulty breathing, nausea and vomiting.  The greatest risk is to the elderly, children and those who already have a respiratory illness, for example asthma and bronchitis.

Regulatory approach

The Environment Agency has issued guidance which applies to all those who hold, or are applying for, a permit to store or treat combustible waste. (The permits are issued under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010). There are also other situations when the EA may specify that a fire prevention plan is required.

The EA recommends that operators who are exempt from the requirement for a permit, but who store combustible wastes, should also the guidance and take from it the relevant principles.

What’s in the guidance

“Fire Prevention Plans” (version 2 March 2015, which replaced the previous TGN 7.01) sets out in detail what is required of the plan, i.e.:

  • the types and quantities of waste stored
  • hazardous substances
  • sources of ignition
  • site layout including any environmentally vulnerable features and access routes for both normal and emergency use
  • an assessment of fire risk
  • storage methods and management arrangements
  • measures to prevent fires from starting
  • details of monitoring arrangements and fire detection
  • details of fire-fighting arrangements
  • emergency procedures
  • environmental protection measures such as the collection of fire-fighting run-off.

The types of combustible materials to be assessed include paper, cardboard, plastics, rubber, wood, textiles, scrap metals, waste electrical equipment, compost and more.

The guidance includes plenty of practical details about storage methods including maximum pile sizes, separation and rotation.

Flexibility

This “guidance” is highly prescriptive and although you can choose to do something different you must show that your plan is just as good or better for the environment.  This will entail detailed “modelling assessments” to demonstrate the likelihood of fire, expected impact and the emergency response required. Due to the expense associated with bespoke plans, for most businesses, following the guidance is the most attractive option.

The future

The EA has undertaken a consultation on the effectiveness of the guidance issued in March 2015. This consultation is now closed, and it seems that we won’t hear more about the EAs plans until the end of 2016. It says that has co-funded a series of “waste fire burn tests” along with the Waste Industry Safety and Health forum (WISH) to find out more about the behaviour of waste when it burns. The results of this research are anticipated later this year, and will then be considered along with the consultation responses to amend the guidance.

However, based on the contents of the consultative document it appears that the majority of the changes will be minor. It seems that the essential structure of the guidance is likely to remain unchanged and that specific points might alter, e.g. setting a minimum separation distance of 6 metres for all waste types, reducing the maximum pile size permitted for wood waste, requiring plans to include environmentally sensitive localities and so on.

Tell us what you think

If you work in the waste sector we’d be interested to hear your comments below on your experiences of fire prevention planning and the application of this sector guide.

 

2023 Fire Safety eBook – Grab your free copy!

Download the Fire Safety in 2023 eBook, keeping you up to date with the biggest news and prosecution stories from around the industry. Chapters include important updates such as the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and an overview of the new British Standard for the digital management of fire safety information.

Plus, we explore the growing risks of lithium-ion battery fires and hear from experts in disability evacuation and social housing.

FireSafetyeBook-CoverPage-23

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Basson212
Basson212
April 28, 2016 6:56 pm

Hi Claire< Considering the number of Waste fires continues to cause concerns, my question would be why hasn’t the Fire Services used the RRO to enforce the Waste companies to comply. Especially with the WISH guidance also now in place. etc?

Crizos
Crizos
May 11, 2016 10:15 am

Basson212

I don’t know, but
would it have something to do with FRS priorities – they are very focussed on
life protection as demonstrated by the amount of resource put into home fire
safety. I don’t imagine that environmental protection is measured in
performance statistics – can anyone else comment on this?