IFSECInsider-Logo-Square-23

Author Bio ▼

IFSEC Insider, formerly IFSEC Global, is the leading online community and news platform for security and fire safety professionals.
September 19, 2008

Nothing found. Please check your show/episode id.

Download

State of Physical Access Trend Report 2024

Q+A: Open Network Video Interface Forum

Andersson is business development director at Axis. ONVIF – which stands for Open Network Video Interface Forum – aims to develop an open industry standard and is now inviting would-be participants to register via its new website at www.onvif.org.

i4s: How did you arrive at the decision to drive for these standards with some of your competitors?

Jonas Andersson: We are talking with our competitors about various industry issues much of the time and it was clear to us that cooperation in agreeing, and some cases creating, network layer standards is now important to help take the network video market to the next level. These standards will enable communications interoperability between network cameras and video encoders and video management systems and other networked security systems regardless of manufacturer.

i4s: What exact communications issues will the standards resolve?

Jonas Andersson: We aim to agree standards for all types of control of a camera including video streaming, device discovery, PTZ control, encryption of data streams, intelligent meta data and other user handling capabilities. The intention is to lay out precisely what standards we will be looking to set in the Framework, which will be presented at the Security show in Essen in October 2008.

i4s: What do you think will be the impact of having these standards in place, once they are agreed?

Jonas Andersson: It will definitely speed up adoption of network video in security applications. It will be much easier for the integrators to develop software to support a standard than to support each brand separately. For specifiers and end-users a standard may help them determine which system they should specify and use. For example, having a single standard for device discovery will mean that installers will be able to select ‘best of breed’ solutions for specific applications, safe in the knowledge that (provided the vendors are complying with the agreed device discovery protocol) they will be able to find that device and communicate with it over the network.

i4s: Do you need to understand the ‘IP Stack’ in some detail to understand where you are looking to create standards?

Jonas Andersson: Not really. Suffice to say that these standards are in the Network layer of the IP Stack (the layer that is responsible for source to destination data packet delivery). The great thing is that many of these standards are already out there. Take the H.264 and MPEG-4 part 2 compression algorithm standards for example. In this and several other instances it will be simply a matter of agreeing the default standards that cameras should be set to. This will reduce the amount of configuration work that installers will have to do considerably and make life easier for traditional security installers with little grounding in network integration, something we need to bear in mind in several European markets including the UK.

i4s: What will the Framework mean?

Jonas Andersson: The Framework will determine precisely which standards we are going to drive to create first. It will determine what problems we are addressing as a matter of priority. We will also be using this important staging post to formally create an Open Standards Forum and invite other organisations to participate in this standards debate. Hopefully we will see a number of major players choosing to join us then and we have certainly had some encouraging signs from vendors that many will join come October.

i4s: How will you be collaborating with existing standards bodies? How will you avoid overlap?

Jonas Andersson: We see organisations like CENELEC in Europe and the SIA in the US as important organisations in terms of defining what standards are needed. We see our initiative dovetailing well with the work of these bodies because they will be defining what to communicate between different devices and we will define how it shall be done at the network layer which enables more uniform interoperability between network video devices.

i4s: Why is Axis driving for this change? Won’t it increase competition in your market?

Jonas Andersson: We have always believed in an open market and that it will be beneficial for network video. That is why we have always made Open Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) freely available to our network cameras and run a global Application Developer Programme (ADP) to encourage the software developer community to build applications for our cameras and encoders. It’s by widening the availability and uses of our devices that we extend our market leadership, and with a market expanding by more than 40 per cent per annum, we believe that there is enough room for several competitors to thrive, as long as we can keep stimulating take-up and migration from CCTV to IP surveillance. Hammering out these standards must therefore be seen in the context of clearing the roadblocks to the continued growth of the network video market as a whole.

i4s: What will the drive for standards mean for CCTV-focused security installers, consultants, specifiers and managers of these systems in the UK?

Jonas Andersson: We hope it will stimulate both end users and installers alike to look hard at IP surveillance as it becomes easier and easier to install and run these systems and as remaining technical hurdles melt away. The fact that, with standards in place, they will be able to select best-of-breed products for all aspects of a security solution as opposed to being tied into a specific vendor regardless of whether it has the right product for a specific application, can only help encourage migration to IP surveillance.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments