Avatar photo

Contributor

Author Bio ▼

Adam Bannister is a contributor to IFSEC Global, having been in the role of Editor from 2014 through to November 2019. Adam also had stints as a journalist at cybersecurity publication, The Daily Swig, and as Managing Editor at Dynamis Online Media Group.
March 3, 2014

Download

Whitepaper: Enhancing security, resilience and efficiency across a range of industries

Interview: Analogue CCTV, digital access – security in the `cloud`

JW2Cloudview, which marries analogue CCTV with digital access and storage, is the brainchild of James Wickes.

An entrepreneur with 30 years’ IT experience, Wickes typifies a new breed of security innovator. I asked him why the market needed a product like Cloudview and if he could allay any fears surrounding cloud computing’s vulnerability to hackers. 

Adam Bannister: So, James, what is Cloudview exactly?

James Wickes: Many services are being automated into the cloud and it seems obvious that CCTV should be one of those services.

The big issue is that CCTV comes under the ‘internet of things’, so you have to physically connect a device, rather than a computer, to the internet to make it work in the cloud – and that’s not straightforward.

It can be very expensive. Cloudview introduces a low-cost, simple and secure way to access CCTV cameras over the internet from any device, anywhere. It’s also, to a large extent, future-proofed.

In particular, it does it for analogue cameras – and that, we think, is a significant advantage given the number of analogue cameras still in the world.

As well as giving you remote access you can record as much or as little information in the cloud as you want. You can control the device it is recording and alarming.

It also has a fairly sophisticated interface that allows you to put as many users onto a camera or cameras as you want. And you can control the permissions of those users.

AB: Are there any similar products on the market?

JW: There are products that look similar. There are lots of Chinese DVRs that allow remote access but they’re not secure, often complex to configure and don’t offer the advantages of the cloud as a quick, flexible and un-nickable way of accessing cameras.

What they don’t do is provide the same level of security or recording into the cloud. And you need things like fixed IP addressing, firewalls and routers to make it work – you don’t need any of that with Cloudview.

AB: And how did the idea come about?Cloudview_box_web

JW: From a personal need. I had an attempted burglary and couldn’t find a product that suited my needs.

So I developed this. We all wander about with our iPads and mobiles expecting to control lots of devices, but actually it’s quite difficult to find a system you can properly control with a mobile phone.

There’s a huge drive toward remote access to CCTV that is brought on by mobile computing.

There’s also a corporate need to upgrade security without ripping out the infrastructure already in place.

AB: Which makes it a relatively cost-effective solution no doubt…

JW: It’s a lot cheaper and more flexible. If you’re buying a Cloudview product you’re also buying a degree of protection against future developments because we constantly upgrade the firmware and those improvements feed through to the user.

AB: One month after you unleashed Cloudview onto the market, what’s the response been like?

JW: I’m pleased to say that’s it’s going well. We’ve got orders running into the many hundreds.

I expect that by the end of this month we’ll have orders for more than a thousand units – which is more than we expected.

We’ve been caught on the hop, though, with demand outstripping supply somewhat, but this should come into equilibrium in March.

AB: Where, geographically, are the orders coming from?

JW: The biggest demand is in the UK but we’re getting orders from places like Armenia, Georgia, Uzbekistan, New Zealand…

Clearly, across swathes of Europe there’s a lot of analogue infrastructure still out there, but the iPhone is with us now and people want access to their investment from their iPhone.

AB: There’s a fairly widespread perception that cloud storage is particularly vulnerable to security breaches…

JW: Customers fall very clearly into two camps: there are people that immediately do not want to take it any further because it’s cloud.

But generally we don’t have trouble persuading people to look at the product because we’re not asking them to replace anything. We’re asking them to add our service to what they already have.

AB: But how does Cloudview do to guard against hackers?

JW: The VNA – the litte box that you plug into the camera – creates an encrypted link between the camera and our service, so while the data is in transit it is protected by a TLS link, which is a sort of bank-level encryption.

I think it’s always very dangerous to say ‘nothing is ever going to get past this’ because you just don’t know. But we’re using the gold standard for data protection – we can’t do any more than that.

AB: Well given your strong start sales-wise you’ve obviously been successful in allaying security concerns…

JW: Interestingly, the end user has been more concerned about security than the trade enquiries, because the end user knows the importance of the data they have to look after – and the liability very much lies with them.

As long as we can demonstrate that security is at the forefront of our thinking in terms of product development then I think we’ll be OK.

AB: Speaking of product development: what next?

JW: Many things, but one of the most interesting is rack-mounted products. The idea behind that was: if you want to connect 50 cameras then you don’t want 50 little boxes.

But the feedback has been, “well, actually, we do want 50 little boxes as it gives us a greater degree of resilience against failure.” So we may put a hold on the rack mount for the time being.

The two things we’re concentrating on are connectivity to IP cameras – as with analogue, we plug and play into any IP camera – and improving our APIs, which let us connect to other systems.

Some corporate organisations we’ve been invited to speak to by resellers say they love our system but they want to keep their current video management or alarm-receiving system.

Free Download: The Video Surveillance Report 2023

Discover the latest developments in the rapidly-evolving video surveillance sector by downloading the 2023 Video Surveillance Report. Over 500 responses to our survey, which come from integrators to consultants and heads of security, inform our analysis of the latest trends including AI, the state of the video surveillance market, uptake of the cloud, and the wider economic and geopolitical events impacting the sector!

Download for FREE to discover top industry insight around the latest innovations in video surveillance systems.

VideoSurveillanceReport-FrontCover-23

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
briansbox
briansbox
March 5, 2014 9:11 am

It is sad that TLS is presented as secure. For short sessions it like banking transactions it offers some security; but for longer sessions ie streaming video, together with the total amount of data involved, it becomes increasingly vulnerable to attack. The more these codes are exposed to attack, the opportunity will lead to better ‘cracks’.

Just to give some perspective; in banking a few thousand bytes may be exchanged, one camera generates 172 gigabytes a day.

urbanshep
urbanshep
March 5, 2014 2:30 pm

TLS has been widely deployed in secure systems around the
world. We are satisfied that TLS represents the best available security for
Cloud applications such as Cloudview. The security of our systems is constantly
under review, and will of course, be upgraded with future developments as soon
they become available.
To transmit 172 gigabytes a day would be uneconomic, just in server bandwidth! A cost effective security solution like
Cloudview could never work on those figures, which are based on a misunderstanding of the Cloudview system.

urbanshep
urbanshep
March 5, 2014 2:31 pm

briansbox  TLS has been widely deployed in secure systems around the
world. We are satisfied that TLS represents the best available security for
Cloud applications such as Cloudview. The security of our systems is constantly
under review, and will of course, be upgraded with future developments as soon
they become available.
To transmit 172 gigabytes a day would be totally
uneconomic, just in server bandwidth! A cost effective security solution like
Cloudview could never work on those figures, which are based on a complete
misunderstanding of the Cloudview system.

briansbox
briansbox
March 5, 2014 4:52 pm

urbanshep briansbox My point was the internet is not secure, access to the cloud does not change that fact. The internet should be viewed as one large computer with many ports; the longer the ports are open, the higher the probability that the port will be found, analysed and interrogated.

Thousands of analysts around the world spend their working time cataloguing and analysing the data. This is why placing any data/pictures on the web makes it available around the world.

For those with criminal intent, they can ‘case the joint’ and sell the information to others to commit the crime.

urbanshep
urbanshep
March 6, 2014 9:35 pm

briansbox urbanshep  Initially I thought your point was that TLS was being presented as
secure. However, if your point is actually that the internet is insecure then I
must agree with you. That’s why there are multiple measures in cloudview to protect client
data of which TLS is one.

briansbox
briansbox
March 7, 2014 12:36 am

urbanshep briansbox My point was that TLS should not be relied upon for the security of larger data sets. The overuse of encryption which was designed for small data sets, on large data sets leads to the failure of the encryption. This has caused the very public failure of both WEP and WPA encryption. Designing secure encryption systems is not easy, having to replace TLS would be costly.  I think the last place to put data, that needs to be secure, is on the net or in the cloud. These systems were designed to enable data to be widely distributed and not to be… Read more »

urbanshep
urbanshep
March 7, 2014 3:14 pm

briansbox urbanshep  While I appreciate the points you are making, we operate in a world where customers expect us to employ industry standard technologies, such as TLS, to deliver the security needed to protect data held by a SaaS solution like Cloudview. Moreover, while you may see the cloud as the last place to put sensitive data, the general trend is otherwise driven by well-publicised benefits such as ease of deployment and the low cost of subscription-based licensing plus, as in the case of Cloudview, secure remote access without the need for complicated VPN technology. Security is still an issue, of… Read more »

briansbox
briansbox
March 7, 2014 7:03 pm

urbanshep briansbox Thank you for your responses

Peter Brown
Peter Brown
March 28, 2014 2:09 pm

We would be interested in a 4 & 8 channel unit, with loop through.  Or a DVR with your software inside.

Look forward to new products

Peter Brown
http://www.omegasecurityltd.com