IFSEC Insider is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Rob Ratcliff was the Content and Community Manager of IFSEC Global.com. He is a self-confessed everyman in the world of security and fire, keen to learn from the global community of experts who have been a part of IFSEC for 40 years now.
You’re a control room operator in a busy operations centre for the London Underground. You’re alerted to a fire on the platform at one of more than 600 stations in the network. Now what?
Call the fire brigade? Evacuate the station? Contact staff at the station to investigate whether the fire is real, and how big it is? Check it yourself on the video surveillance system?
There are a number of possible first steps an operator could take, and there will undoubtedly be a defined process he or she should follow. But how often does an operator have to deal with such an incident? How can you be more certain that they will take the correct steps in the correct order?
For the past two years that I’ve been reporting on the security and fire industries, I’ve heard, read, and talked about so-called PSIM (physical security information management) systems. NICE Systems is one vendor of a PSIM system, and I was able to see and hear some real-world examples of its NICE Situator for the first time at this month’s UK Security Conference at Mercedes-Benz World in Surrey.
The conference’s delegate list reflects the kinds of organizations looking at PSIM — representatives of De Beers, EA Sports, Barclays, British Airways, and Deutsche Bank were just some of the people in attendance. And they’re here to find out about the huge benefits that an operational situation management platform can bring them.
NICE Situator is a complex system that connects otherwise siloed departments and systems in the event of an emergency. By joining up interested parties from transport police, fire service, security, operations, transport authorities, and maintenance teams, to name but a few, you can identify, respond to, and recover from a crisis more quickly.
By integrating systems from various manufacturers, the system uses an “advanced correlation engine” to add logic and give an operations centre a clear process for incident response. This is big-data analytics in action.
All operations centres will have a best-practice response, but in many cases that best-practice may well be written in a memo gathering dust on a bookshelf. Where a system such as Situator adds value is it brings the best-practice straight to the operator.
When the fire alarm sounds, the control room operator is shown the corresponding video surveillance feed and a map on his geographic information system. The operator is presented with simple questions and actions.
Action: Monitor fire with camera. Question: Are there signs of smoke or fire? Answer: Yes.
Meanwhile, a member of staff at the station has been despatched to the fire, with his mobile device asking him: Have you arrived at the platform? Yes. Have you contained the fire? No.
Back to the operations centre, where the control room operator’s system is auto-dialling the fire service and ordering an evacuation. The GIS system now shows a map with the evacuation routes and nearest fire fighting devices. The video analytics system is now using intrusion detection analytics to detect anyone who is ignoring the order to evacuate and showing them on the operator’s screen.
The tag line sums this all up simply: Getting the right insights to the right people at the right time.
A PSIM system isn’t cheap, but for a large organization the benefits are immense. Millenium Banks in Portugal, for instance, saved euro 658,000 a year by reducing its false alarms from 20,000 to 1,200.
De Beers
Jim Lucas, head of security technical services, diamond risk management, for De Beers, explained how the diamond house use a situational response system to save millions of dollars in potential theft. He told the conference:
NICE represents the single biggest spend as a proportion of what we spend [on security technology]. We have thousands of cameras — standalone they achieve nothing. There’s very little point in showing a video of our diamonds being stolen. What we want to do is prevent these.
NICE’s system, he explained, allows his operators to manage scenarios more quickly and more effectively as they’re developing. But the value of the system also extends to business processes. While diamond theft may be a significant part of lost revenue, so is the time miners spend in security screening. If, using technology, DeBeers can speed the screening process up then the miners are able to spend more time doing what they’re paid to do.
NICE employs what is called a 6-sigma improvement methodology to the processes that its clients follow during an incident. This process started in manufacturing where a factory line would use the methodology in order to aim for just 3.4 products per million being faulty. The methodology involves what is called a five-step DMAIC project methodology:
Define
Measure
Analyse
Improve
Control
By replaying an incident in real-time afterwards for analysis, an organization can play back all of the data and plug that back into the planning tool to create a new best-practice. The user doesn’t have to be retrained as he or she will simply see the new best-practice next time there’s an incident.
This is where many people see the real value of a situational management platform, as it ensures compliance through the evidence it generates in incident replay, as well as giving organizations
the ability to continually and gradually evolve their responses.
PSIMs are certainly not for your average small business, but when you look at the fact that one US utility company increased the number of sites it monitored from 14 to 250 after installing Situator, without increasing the headcount in the control room, then you begin to understand the potential.
Free Download: The Video Surveillance Report 2023
Discover the latest developments in the rapidly-evolving video surveillance sector by downloading the 2023 Video Surveillance Report. Over 500 responses to our survey, which come from integrators to consultants and heads of security, inform our analysis of the latest trends including AI, the state of the video surveillance market, uptake of the cloud, and the wider economic and geopolitical events impacting the sector!
Download for FREE to discover top industry insight around the latest innovations in video surveillance systems.
Emergency Response: Making Best-Practices RoutineYou’re a control room operator in a busy operations centre for the London Underground. You’re alerted to a fire on […]
Robert Ratcliff
IFSEC Insider | Security and Fire News and Resources
Subscribe
11 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JonathanL
June 26, 2013 11:24 am
6-Sigma is a great methodology for driving out errors in a process or routine. Reading the article put me in mind of another great example of loss prevention that you did not mention, Major Las Vegas Casinos would have a system filled with cameras and rehersed responses on this type of level where millions of dollars could potentially be at stake. Probably what makes 6-sigma best suited for is this is that the situations at these types of operations occur repeatedly and thats where it draws its strength.
could not agree more good example… but from my knowledge of Las Vegas… they could afford to hire best and purchase latest and greatest technology… Plus constat training and upgrade/practice in the field…
I think the most interesting aspect is the way you can add in the new processes without having to re-train the operator. This leaves the operator to focus on doing his job more. Agree that casinos is a great example of a place that would benefit, and somewhere that has the budget too…
Batye absolutely. I agree with the example. I feel that places like these are suppose to have emergency equipment as well as practices in place to counter any situation. I feel these places should be bound by law to follow these routines
Batye I am very much in favour of forcefully making companys adopt methods and activities that can ensure the safety of human life. If we let them to decide about adoption I think we mean 10-20 percent progress.
Seems to be a general conversation rather than anything specific but I would add that any life safety processes will be generally covered by rules on manslaughter or corporate manslaughter. Any employer who has put lives at risk through a lack of action should expect to have their day in court.
@ batye
I absolutely agree. The casinos, especially in cities like Las Vegas should certainly be able to afford the the best technologies and practices when it comes to emergency preparedness.
6-Sigma is a great methodology for driving out errors in a process or routine. Reading the article put me in mind of another great example of loss prevention that you did not mention, Major Las Vegas Casinos would have a system filled with cameras and rehersed responses on this type of level where millions of dollars could potentially be at stake. Probably what makes 6-sigma best suited for is this is that the situations at these types of operations occur repeatedly and thats where it draws its strength.
Nice example JonathnL
A casino is definitely a place to have a good emergency response routine in place.
could not agree more good example… but from my knowledge of Las Vegas… they could afford to hire best and purchase latest and greatest technology… Plus constat training and upgrade/practice in the field…
I think the most interesting aspect is the way you can add in the new processes without having to re-train the operator. This leaves the operator to focus on doing his job more. Agree that casinos is a great example of a place that would benefit, and somewhere that has the budget too…
Batye absolutely. I agree with the example. I feel that places like these are suppose to have emergency equipment as well as practices in place to counter any situation. I feel these places should be bound by law to follow these routines
yes, you are right, thank you, I think/hope soon we would see some changes towards this smart way…
Batye I am very much in favour of forcefully making companys adopt methods and activities that can ensure the safety of human life. If we let them to decide about adoption I think we mean 10-20 percent progress.
yes, you are right… and value of the human life is priceless…
Seems to be a general conversation rather than anything specific but I would add that any life safety processes will be generally covered by rules on manslaughter or corporate manslaughter. Any employer who has put lives at risk through a lack of action should expect to have their day in court.
@ batye
I absolutely agree. The casinos, especially in cities like Las Vegas should certainly be able to afford the the best technologies and practices when it comes to emergency preparedness.
And they should also expect to pay dearly!