Avatar photo

Author Bio ▼

Rob Ratcliff was the Content and Community Manager of IFSEC Global.com. He is a self-confessed everyman in the world of security and fire, keen to learn from the global community of experts who have been a part of IFSEC for 40 years now.
February 21, 2013

Nothing found. Please check your show/episode id.

Download

State of Physical Access Trend Report 2024

Privatisation Plans Causing Controversy

In the last week, the government has raised the prospect of two privatisation plans, but one is proving more controversial and emotive than the other.

Click here to view Figure 1.

First, plans to privatise prisons in the UK have been backed by think tank Reform, which has concluded that private companies are better at running prisons than the public sector.

Privately operated prisons out-performed public sector ones across a range of measures, with one of the most important — prisoner rehabilitation — falling in their favour; seven out of 12 private prisons had lower reoffending rates than comparable publically operated facilities.

But it’s the “back-door” privatisation of the UK’s Fire Services that is really causing anger among communities — the idea of “cooperatives”.

What is the government actually looking into?

A statement from the Department for Communities and Local Government says:

Fire and rescue authorities will remain statutorily responsible for this public service and to suggest otherwise is completely wrong.

The government does, however, support co-operatives and employee ownership. We are keen to work with local authorities and their staff wanting to explore the scope for employee-led mutuals, where there is local support and backing.

Cleveland Fire’s mutual
Cleveland Fire and Rescue Service — serving the North East of England — is the first to look at transferring its fire fighting service to an employee-led mutual, something critics are calling the beginning of the full-scale privatisation of our fire services.

A petition on the website 38 Degrees calls on the Coalition Government to “stop your plans to open up our fire service to privatisation, which you are trying to do through the back door”.

The petition has received over 56,000 signatures since being published at the start of the week.

And it’s not just the public who are unhappy. Former government fire minister Chris Leslie slammed the Coalition’s current fire minister, Brandon Lewis, in an interview with the BBC:

The ministers are taking this through a committee — a little known committee in the House of Commons — but actually I think they should have the courage to admit what they are doing, which is out sourcing the entirety of the fire services.

I think it’s a step too far. It’s a different thing saying IT services or human resource management service within a fire fighting service should be outsourced, but to sell off everything is full scale privatisation.

I don’t think that profit should be at the forefront in fire and rescue protection.

But why is there such anger from both public and ministers?

Privatisation’s bad public perception

It seems to me that it’s all to do with public perception. One of the many comments on the 38 Degrees survey pointed to the train operators being an example of how putting profit first has resulted in poorer service.

But, honestly, can we really say that trains are any worse now than they were before 1993? Antiquated “slam door” rolling stock that hadn’t be replaced for decades compared with the trains we largely take for granted today?

A recent study by rail analyst Barry Doe actually found that train season ticket prices were often cheaper in real terms now than they were then. It might not feel like it to the squeezed commuter, but rail services in this country really aren’t that bad.

As I prepare myself for the inevitable backlash of my previous comment, I must return us to the issue of prisons.

What is the reason for the better performance of private-sector prisons?

According to Reform, it is partly to do with flexible working conditions. Such conditions result in higher staff satisfaction and a more diverse workforce, in turn leading to better staff/prisoner relationships, and an overall more positive prison environment.

The think tank has recommended that the government market test all prisons — a process that has only been carried out with 17 of England and Wales’ 131 prisons so far — and that they should all be subject to fixed-term contracts, just like, yep, train operators.

If Reform is correct, this will mean prisons will be more efficient, resulting in higher levels of prisoner rehabilitation.

If privatisation of UK fire services was pushed through, via the back door or not, would performance go the same way?

Keep your eye on Cleveland Fire and Rescue Service, and you may have your answer.

Free Download: The Video Surveillance Report 2023

Discover the latest developments in the rapidly-evolving video surveillance sector by downloading the 2023 Video Surveillance Report. Over 500 responses to our survey, which come from integrators to consultants and heads of security, inform our analysis of the latest trends including AI, the state of the video surveillance market, uptake of the cloud, and the wider economic and geopolitical events impacting the sector!

Download for FREE to discover top industry insight around the latest innovations in video surveillance systems.

VideoSurveillanceReport-FrontCover-23
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sheh
Sheh
February 21, 2013 1:49 pm

I think privatization is a fairly good idea. It’s surely going to bring improvement in the state of public prisons. We have to admit that prisons are few of the places in Govt sector which are neglected and need attention. No heed has been paid towards the better facilities for inmates and their rehabilitation in the recent past. The controversy has risen on number of issues. Infact we keep the security of senstitive places very close to our heart. We fear that if things are privatized or out sourced then the safety may be compromised in such circumstances. I believe… Read more »

n3td3v
n3td3v
February 21, 2013 3:19 pm

Privatisation is fine as long as it is regulated, transparent and accountable.

Andrew Wallace

Rob Ratcliff
Rob Ratcliff
February 22, 2013 9:09 am
Reply to  Sheh

A matter of the heart, rather than a matter of the head perhaps then?

Sheh
Sheh
February 22, 2013 9:32 am
Reply to  Rob Ratcliff

Absoultely Rob. I profess the same very thing. If we go by the statistics or numbers, the things would never marterialize. Somehow people would have to pay more heed to humane side of it. While managing slammers , we tend to forget that these are the places which reform human being into better citizens for tomorrow. The point is not only to punish someone but to take out a reformed person out of him by purging his wrong and insidious notions from his head. Better facilities would surely bring postive impact on the society in the longer run. 

Rob Ratcliff
Rob Ratcliff
February 26, 2013 9:48 am
Reply to  Sheh

Absolutely, and this is why the Honduras Prison fire was such a shocking one. The murder rate in that country is enormous and the prisons are squallid and overcramped. Perhaps, and I say this with a massive perhaps, if conditions were better, reformation would be higher.

Sheh
Sheh
February 26, 2013 12:14 pm
Reply to  Rob Ratcliff

Exactly Rob. Most of the people in our region once go to jail they will be treated very badly in the prison and instead of comming out as abetter person they always act against the law and join those people working against the LEA’s. If the persons are put in a jail with different categories and their treatment is according to their crime with proper supervision and preoper training of being a better humans I think it might work. But still we have few out of blue examples where people under custody topped the 10th grade exams and earn scholorship.… Read more »

Welland
Welland
February 28, 2013 10:15 am
Reply to  Sheh

Assetco’s spectacular failure and the mess G4S left the olympics in should provide us with all of the information we need to know about privatising vital services.

Robert Grossman
Robert Grossman
February 28, 2013 12:10 pm
Reply to  Sheh

  It’s interesting reading about proposed privatization of fire departments in the UK. In the US, the Volunteer Fire Department is alive and well in many areas. The community generally funds a portion of the operations, pays for insurance, and often has a paid chief, but fires are fought by volunteers. The fund raising efforts – coin drops, spaghetti dinners, and mailed solicitations to residents – are prevalent but they contribute to a sense of community and it’s a compromise that works well. I’m curious as to whether or not this works in other parts of the world or is… Read more »

Mike Buckley
Mike Buckley
March 8, 2013 10:17 am

In the UK we tried private fire brigades long ago and abandoned it. It was run by Insurance companies and resulted in non insured houses being left to burn as I hear can happen in the US. As well as sabotage between insurance brigades and even running fights. The other factor in this country was World War 2 where we had to find efficient ways of dealing with very very large fires and the amount of resources required. Another aspect to consider is that although there are volunteer brigades in the US is the New Yrok Fire Department one of… Read more »