IFSEC Insider is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
Will Richmond-Coggan is a partner and solicitor-advocate at Pitmans LLP, one of the leading firms in the South of England. He specialises in dealing with technology and social media disputes, with a particular emphasis on privacy and data protection issues, as well as a wide range of disputes involving reputation online.
With the emergence of smart cars, automated drones and wearable technology, it feels that a future long heralded in science fiction might be about to arrive.
But in contrast to the world of fiction, where futuristic technology is frequently just deployed and integrated without difficulty into existing society, the real world is a little less straightforward.
Thus, in wearable technology in particular, lawyers are already starting to see a range of issues arising from this attempt to embrace the future.
One of the standard bearers for wearable technology has been the Google Glass device, looking like a pair of ordinary(ish) glasses, but with the lenses doubling up as screens for the display of supplementary information and also incorporating other features such as a touchpad controller and a built-in camera.
It is this last feature in particular which has already started to cause problems. There were reports in January of a man being detained in Ohio and questioned for three hours by Homeland Security after wearing a Google Glass device, with prescription lenses fitted, to the cinema.
He was accused of participation in a film piracy ring, and was only released when he finally persuaded the agents to connect the USB port on the device to their computers and verify that there was no infringing content stored there.
Although in that case the official response proved to be an overreaction, a wide range of professional working environments are having to consider carefully whether they will allow Google Glass on the premises.
Photo: Leonard Low under CC 2.0
Privacy risk
Where staff are equipped with wearable technology that is capable of making audio and video recordings, and they have access to confidential information about customers or clients, the risks of privacy invasion or data theft are significant.
That brings us to one of the really hot topics in relation to wearable technology – its interaction with the development of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies for employers.
Even those employers who have already put in place such a policy may well have been focused on smart phones/laptops or USB hard-drives that were expected to be making a wired or wi-fi connection to the employer’s network.
Near-Field technology or Bluetooth connections greatly increase the risk of data being misappropriated in ways that are significantly harder for the employer to detect through standard network monitoring, making the importance of a detailed and rigorously enforced BYOD policy all the greater.
And of course, the risk is not merely of data being appropriated by the employees. BYOD also entails significant risks of infection of the network, as a yet wider range of devices are brought into the work environment, some of which may well contain significant security short-comings.
Staff are increasingly trained to be on alert for e-mails bearing the hallmarks of social engineering or spear-phishing attempts to gain access to the company’s systems.
But they’re unlikely to be so vigilant about their home networks which, in all likelihood, will interact with the same portable devices that are then taken into the office.
Employment policies
For the future, the importance of keeping up to date with these employment policies is going to be central to good information security practice in a professional environment.
But, of course, private users must also be vigilant about the terms of policies governing the privacy of data which they upload using wearable tech.
Babywear that monitors your child’s heart-rate, metabolism and core temperature might seem like a boon to anxious parents of a newborn. But are they taking the time to satisfy themselves that the data collected will not be shared with advertisers or other third parties such as health-care insurers?
Objecting after the event will not help if the effect of the small print supplied with the product is that they have consented to precisely the data use which they now wish to object to.
Similarly, as the technology continues to advance, developing a more and more comprehensive picture of people’s lives and daily habits (particularly in the fields of health-care and workplace monitoring), how are the end users to satisfy themselves that appropriate care is going to be taken of the data harvested from them, as it is distributed to the various third parties who wish to commercially exploit it?
This is where robust and rigorous privacy policies will be essential, but there may also be the need for central legislation to guarantee certain minimum standards of privacy as fundamental, in the absence of a conscious decision to opt out from them.
As is usual, any coverage of the legal issues around wearable technology will tend to focus on the negatives.
The fact is that this is new and exciting technology which has the potential to improve the lives and well-being of a good many users.
But without proper scrutiny at this stage, the opportunity properly to police the uses to which such technology may be put could be lost, and the risks identified above might prove to be merely the tip of the iceberg.
Free Download: The Video Surveillance Report 2023
Discover the latest developments in the rapidly-evolving video surveillance sector by downloading the 2023 Video Surveillance Report. Over 500 responses to our survey, which come from integrators to consultants and heads of security, inform our analysis of the latest trends including AI, the state of the video surveillance market, uptake of the cloud, and the wider economic and geopolitical events impacting the sector!
Download for FREE to discover top industry insight around the latest innovations in video surveillance systems.
How Wearable Tech is Creating Legal Headaches for Regulators and EmployersWill Richmond-Coggan of Pitmans LLP explores the myriad legal issues arising from the use of Google glasses and similar tech in the workplace and society in general.
Will Richmond-Coggan
IFSEC Insider | Security and Fire News and Resources
Related Topics
IFSEC Interviews: Vanti – Empowering smarter buildings with integrated systems
Data at the heart of smart cities: How to get ready for exponential growth and real-time access
Top 5 ways AI and data are powering the smart cities of the future